Independence-class littoral combat ship
A Shipyard Milestone Years in the Making
After more than 15 years of continuous construction, Austal USA has handed over the final Independence-class littoral combat ship to the U.S. Navy. The vessel, named USS Pierre after the capital of South Dakota, marks the end of a shipbuilding era for the Alabama-based shipyard.
Michelle Kruger, president of Austal USA, called the delivery of USS Pierre a deeply memorable moment. “Though USS Pierre is the last LCS Austal USA will deliver, we remain committed to supporting the U.S. Navy with innovative maritime solutions,” she stated proudly. For many at Austal, this wasn’t just about delivering a ship—it was about completing a journey.
What the LCS Was Meant to Be
The Navy initiated the Independence-class littoral combat ship program with great expectations. These vessels were envisioned as nimble, modular platforms capable of tackling close-shore threats—like mines, submarines, and fast attack craft. Their sleek trimaran design and aviation deck were tailored for speed and flexibility, with room for two MH-60 helicopters in the hangar.
The USS Independence kicked things off back in 2010. Fast forward to today, and the 19th vessel—USS Pierre—completes the run. But it’s fair to say the road hasn’t been smooth.
A Promise That Struggled in Practice
For all its ambition, the Independence-class littoral combat ship often found itself under scrutiny. Early on, hopes were high that the modular design would give commanders the freedom to swap mission sets quickly. Instead, delays in mission system development and persistent mechanical issues kept the fleet in dock far too often.
Both the Independence and Freedom variants have struggled with similar problems—from hull cracks to propulsion failures. In some cases, the Navy resorted to pulling parts from other ships just to keep others afloat.
Repair Bills That Tell a Bigger Story
Between 2018 and 2020, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reviewed 18 LCS maintenance orders. The findings weren’t comforting. Usually, the work required exceeded the original plan, leading to ballooning costs and missed timelines.
For the Independence-class littoral combat ship, the situation was particularly striking. Contractors were flown to foreign ports for basic maintenance, with government-paid travel bills running from a few thousand dollars to over $1 million. This figure prompts serious inquiries within the Pentagon.
Speed and Agility Came at a Cost
The Independence-class littoral combat ship, in theory, offered the ideal combination of speed, modularity, and flexibility to counter 21st-century threats. But in practice, critics say the LCS fell short when it came to core military expectations—like durability in a fight and ease of maintenance.
The Congressional Research Service was among the first to raise concerns. Their 2019 report cited real concerns over the LCS’s survivability, limited weaponry, and how long it took to properly develop its modular mission packages.
A Ship That Sailed Through Tough Times
Despite all the challenges, Austal USA kept building—and the Navy kept taking delivery. That says something about perseverance, both on the shipyard floor and in naval logistics. The Independence-class littoral combat ship may not have met every expectation, but it did contain important lessons about modular design and rapid production.
Furthermore, vessels such as the USS Pierre continue to serve an important role. They can serve in lower-threat environments, support special operations, and free up more capable platforms for high-stakes missions. Not every ship must compete directly with a destroyer.
Looking Forward: The Navy’s Next Chapter
With the Independence-class littoral combat ship program now closed, attention shifts to what comes next. Austal USA has already turned to new projects—including autonomous ships and auxiliary vessels—as it adapts to the Navy’s changing needs.
Meanwhile, the Navy is trying to reset its shipbuilding efforts. There’s a clear desire to avoid the pitfalls of the LCS program. Future designs will need to be tougher, better armed, and easier to maintain—without sacrificing the flexibility that modern navies increasingly require.
Wrapping Up: A Ship Class That Taught Hard Lessons
The USS Pierre may be the last of its class, but its arrival still matters. It represents closure for one of the Navy’s most ambitious—and controversial—projects. The Independence-class littoral combat ship was bold, experimental, and undeniably flawed. However, it pioneered new frontiers and yielded significant insights for future developments.
As the Navy modernizes its fleet, it must carry those hard-earned lessons forward. And perhaps one day, the ships that follow will achieve what the LCS never fully could: agile, cost-effective, and battle-ready vessels that can meet the demands of a rapidly shifting maritime world.
References
- Navy Times
- GAO LCS Maintenance Report
- Congressional Research Service
- Austal USA Official Site
- Defense News
About the Author
